Essentially, this is a book about conversation and draws out the various aspects that are involved. Rather than taking up a position on a topic and defending it, De Bono's approach is more of looking How to Have a Beautiful Mind. Edward De Bono. Beauty of physical appearance does not necessarily mean beauty of mind. Looking good is important but having an exciting, flexible and creative mind is even better.
De Bono explains how to apply lateral and parallel thinking to everyday conversation; learn how to agree and disagree, how to respond by picking out points of interest, how to open your mind to other people's viewpoints, how to listen, and how to expand your creativity in a way that can help you to change your life. He has held appointments at the universities of Oxford, London, Cambridge and Harvard. In de Bono invented the now commonly used term 'lateral thinking' and, for many thousands, indeed millions, of people worldwide, his name has since become a symbol of creativity and new thinking.
He has written numerous books, which have been translated into 34 languages, and his advice is sought by Nobel laureates and world leaders alike.
How to Have a Beautiful Mind ( Pages )
Russia Account, The by Stephen Coonts. Crooked Staircase, The by Dean Koontz. Buried Deep by T. Eighth Sister, The by Robert Dugoni. Rich Dad Poor Dad: 20th Ann Nanaville by Anna Quindlen.
- Hume and the Enlightenment.
- Account Options?
- How to Have a Beautiful Mind.
- The Childrens Baking Book?
- How To Have A Beautiful Mind by Edward de Bono.
Fifth Doctrine, The by Karen Robards. Thousand Doors, A by J. Ellison Editor. Run Away by Harlan Coben. Storm Glass by Jeff Wheeler.
How to Have a Beautiful Mind – De Bono – Review
If you can show a possible alternative, that makes your challenge much stronger. One interpretation of statistics is given, and the impression is given that this interpretation is the only possible version. Yet there are other possible alternative explanations. For example: In Sweden almost 50 per cent of babies are born to unmarried mothers. In Iceland the figure is 66 per cent. This might mean that marriage is not regarded very highly or that there are low moral standards, or that it represents a breakdown of families.
The statistics do not tell whether the couple eventually do get married after the baby is born. To take another example, statistics in Australia show that people born under the Zodiac sign of Gemini are more likely to have car accidents than any other sign. It is rather unlikely that the accident rate for all Zodiac signs would be exactly equal.
So you would like to know whether this finding is significant across different periods and in different countries. The size of the difference would also be important. One possible explanation is that those with a Gemini birthday reach the legal age for driving in winter June in Australia and so start driving in difficult conditions.
Selective perception means perceiving things in such a way as to support a pre-formed idea. The classic use of selective perception is with stereotypes and prejudices. The mind has a fixed pattern and then notices only those things which fit the pattern. Racial prejudice is an obvious example.
A fierce feminist would be ready to pick on any male behaviour evidence to indicate male chauvinism. Selective perception can work both ways. This might suggest that Indians were especially intelligent or skilled at computer work. There is a big software industry in India around Bangalore and there are good training institutes for computer work. So Indians going to the USA were likely to end up in such jobs. Selective perception is difficult to challenge because what is said may be correct. The listener has no way of knowing what has not been said, or has been left out.
A person who tells you all the instances where an employee seems to have been lazy may choose not to tell you all the instances where the same person worked exceptionally hard. If you believe that a certain race commits more crimes, you will only notice instances of that race committing crimes.
You may not see that crime occurs more often in certain economic groups and there happen to be more of that race in these groups. Is the person really giving an objective view or is there an emotional tinge to it? It is usually very easy to tell the emotional content by the adjectives used. See here. Adjectives such as lazy, useless, dishonest, careless, dangerous, devious and shifty immediately suggest that an opinion is very much emotional. If you strip the adjectives from the opinion then the opinion collapses.
The opinion is therefore just a vehicle for the emotions.
People who bought this also bought...
Everyone is free to express their emotions. A listener, however, does not have to be persuaded by the emotions or to agree with them. It is when emotions enter the logic of an opinion that they become dangerous. Emotions can be reactions to events. The same holds for disagreement.
How to Have a Beautiful Mind
A person who lives in a country that has a monarchy may have a very different experience from someone who lives in a country without royalty. A person who has gone through a divorce will have a different experience from someone who has never been divorced. Having a different experience never means that your experience is the right one and the experience of the other party is invalid. For instance: As a young doctor, I found that the nursing staff took very good care of the patients.
As a young doctor, I found that the nursing staff had little time for the patients. At first, the two sets of experience seem contradictory. It then turns out that in the second case the hospital was understaffed and the nurses were overworked, therefore seeming to have little time for the patients. The very nature of generalisations means that the same label applies to everyone or everything that is placed in the labelled box: all children are cute; all lawyers are argumentative; all Italians are romantic; all Frenchwomen are marvellous cooks. If such words will not do because they destroy the logic of the argument, then you need to doubt that logic — at least where it applies to people.
He explained that it meant they would arrive two hours late into New York. A second engine failed and he explained that they would be four hours late. Then a third engine failed. Ecologists have to do this all the time in their warnings about global warming, for example.
gitlab.dev.parkseason.ru/183-azithromycin-y-coronavirus.php Sometimes they may be right and sometimes they may be wrong. The number of students entering tertiary education is rising in most countries. Can we extrapolate that to a world in which everyone has tertiary education and there are not enough suitable jobs to go around? The Chinese economy is growing at 8 per cent a year much faster than most other countries. Can we extrapolate that to make China the dominant economic power in the world? Like sweeping generalisations, extrapolations need to be treated with caution.
There may be some element of truth in them but they are unlikely to work out as claimed. Very often, counter forces come in which oppose the trend. It is possible that raising the school leaving age will reduce juvenile crime. It would be difficult to accept this as a certainty. It is possible that the higher suicide rate among men after the break-up of a relationship is due to the break-up being more of a surprise to men than it is to women. For example: It is possible that China may become a dominant economic power in the next fifty years.
It is just possible that a human colony will be established on the moon or a planet. It is very likely that HIV will become the major problem in Africa. There is a truth concern. You do not want to let someone get away with something which is either untrue or offered as true without being proved to be so.
In the spaghetti metaphor used in Chapter 3 see here , the range of different sauces is a matter of choice.
- The Treaty of Versailles (Milestones in Modern World History).
- Introduction to Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing.
- English Synonyms and Antonyms With Notes on the Correct Use of Prepositions.
- Information-Processing Channels in the Tactile Sensory System: A Psychophysical and Physiological Analysis!
- Comanche Flame (Leisure Historical Romance).
In fact, I have tried this and it works very well! If, however, someone suggested using diesel fuel on the spaghetti you would certainly reject this — not only in terms of taste but it may also be poisonous. It is too abrupt simply to say that you disagree. The method of disagreement does need to be indicated. Once this is done the disagreement can be explored. Do not disagree for the sake of disagreeing. Do not disagree just to show how clever you are or to boost your ego.